I've decided to publish my dissertation on here because one, it's relevant to this blog since it's on Hume, and two, it's for ease of reference when discussing Hume, history of philosophy, empathy, feminist ethics, and ethics, as well as when I refer to it on my blog on Empathy, available via my Blogger user profile or here. BA Philosophy (London uni 4yr p/t) Dissertation (finals 2013) 'A Feminist History of Philosophy Approach to Sympathy and the Concept of Empathy in Hume: On the Possibility of an Empathy-Based Moral Theory' © Liba (Libuse) Kaucky 2012-13 All Rights Reserved No reproduction without written permission from Liba Kaucky ResearcherID: P-2484-2016, ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1598-0833 The moral rights of this author have been asserted, including: The Right of Attribution (eg the right of an author to be credited) The Right to Object to Derogatory Treatment (eg affecting the author’s reputation) The Right of Integrity (eg prejudicial distorti...
During the Q&A after my paper presentation (available here ) and workshop dinner, I noticed that the philosophers there struggled with the fact that Shepherd didn't see miracles as inherently 'special'. They wanted to keep the awe inspiring 'specialness' of miracles to fit in with their own personal preferences and beliefs so, therefore, found it difficult to relate to her definition. I couldn't see the relevance of this subjective approach. For me, it's not about what fits in with my beliefs, or lack of, it's all about what is in the text and how well it's argued. My points of agreement with Hume: ✔ I agree with Hume's account of adjusting one's degree of assurance to avoid mistakes ✔ I agree with Hume's aim to "silence the most arrogant bigotry and superstition" to "free us" from it and prevent "superstitious delusion" ✔ I agree with Hume that when error is introduced, it's due to a lack of under...